- Udig export pdf georeferenced how to#
- Udig export pdf georeferenced install#
- Udig export pdf georeferenced pro#
- Udig export pdf georeferenced mac#
I'm working with SRWare Iron (Chrome) and use
Udig export pdf georeferenced pro#
> looks good don't you like how getting CSS to function is so much work and then so very few lines of code in a diff.Īgree, I'm not a pro in CSS at all therefore its quite hard to get its Tried it with python26 and python27 but it failed.
Udig export pdf georeferenced mac#
I used mac portĪnd got several compile errors at the end during rst2pdf installation. Oh, had a looooong sleepless night because of this.
Udig export pdf georeferenced install#
> Please use "home brew" to install python, and PIL and sphinx-build and so on.
Udig export pdf georeferenced how to#
Do you know how to update python on mac osx (lion)? I guess its because of my python env (2.5.1) and a missing dependencies. > - I thought about using the rst2pdf extension to export pdf out of it but it failed to install it with sudo easy_install rst2pdf. Otherwise a browser have no chance to give you a "page from to" range. Have separated (html) pages because of printing a single chapter, > Question: For the GeoServer Install workbook I combined everything into a single page - should I do this for walkthrough 1? Let's use notes and warnings for the moment. Sidebars makes some when creating pdfs with The advantage of notes/warnings is that theyĬan have different styles. Last night I pushed sidebars to master but I have no strong opinionĪbout notes vs. > I am not really worried about page length on a web page - so if "notes" is better just let me know. notes:: directives instead but this would create longer pages than with the sidebar. sidebar:: directive in the ImportDirectlytoTheCatalog.rst file > - I added an additional line in layout.html of the udig theme : > You assumption is correct this was something I did manually after conversion. > - I tested a bit with sidebars and have a solution for the notes within the odt files (I assume these were not converted by the odt2sphinx tool and we have to check ist after conversion): > Let me know if you think either of these ideas is worth experimenting and running the conversion again. > (This would pull the same image into the docs as is currently sued for the application) Therefor the images are at the right place I think. Images from walkthrough 1 are walkthrough 1 specific - same with I haven't checked it out, but please correct my if I'm wrong: the Where they are, in case of translations in the future we can move toĪn other structure (like osgeo live) where all the images are in the Running application with menus and content. Sure but a lot of pictures in user/dev docs are screenshots from a This solution has seductive charm but I'm not sure about how muchĬontent we can recycle from the plugins folder. image:: /./././plugins/.ui/wizban/import_wiz.png > The other more exciting option is to have it generate something like: > (This would allow us to group the "tasks pages" into a task folder, since the "/image/import_wizard.png" would refer to the root directory conf.py is defined) > I was going to ask you about that should I generate the following instead: I'm not sure about the current committed rst files but I expected a result like this from the the BulkConvert class : > - the images are references with pattern |image_name_extension|.
> I had a look at the origin odt file and the converted rst's a here some comments:
> Today I worked on styling (removed background image) and fixed links in the top navigation div. In addition theĬonverted user documents are not listed in any toctree. Remove the getting_started/index page instead. The "Walkthrough 1" and "Walkthrough 2" pages into getting_started and
The pages and identify these to clean up. IMHO we have some pages with identical content, we should got through Therefor I remove the "turn warnings into error" option "-W". Some links are broken (user/en/html/Walkthrough%201.html)Īnd as a result you get around 800 Warnings from the sphinx build. User/en/html/Intersect%20Operation.html |image0|, |image1| and Prefer to have file names without blanks, I had a look into the docsĪnd I'm wondering about missing images (e.g. I guess you are talking about the conversion from confluence. > I would like a review of the user doc conversion we may wish to tweak things a bit before calling it done and working on the content. > Is the user doc conversion completed that we can start working on the content? I also updated the content a bit, more details down below. > Great! Are you still working on the transformation from odt to rst?
0 kommentar(er)
